We have to act on earth to protect mankind biodiversity and earth how we know it.It cannot be that we will suffer in future concerning one cathastrophe after the other inste of working living consuming raising our children cause of criminal stubborn ignorant billionaire egoists makeing money.We must install rules forcing to reason.

Stop ecocide initiative / Foundation by Jojo Metha to change Rome Statute / ICC – international crime court :

4 possible accuses with ICC now for members only ( not USA / China … ) :

Nr.1 Extinction of People ( Art 6 Rome statute )
Nr.2 Crime against humanity ( Art 7 Rome statute )
Nr.3 War crime ( Art8 Rome statute )
Nr.4 Agression in form of war ( Art 8 bis Rome statute)

In addition thosedays still accepted :

Following Art 8 abs 2 litb Zifir Rome statute war crime is if enviroment is dammaged intensively for war goals.
Further : Based on lex lata Unesco / UN against Al Mahdi destroying of cultural worthes.Environment as entity is still accepted by ICC but not standing alone for itself and its maybee a similar problem like Cultural worthes for judicative and legislative.An argument for a accuse Nr.5 :

Nr.5 (New) Stop ecocide initiative .Legal definition proposal :

1.For the purpose of this Statute, “ecocide” means unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is
a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by
those acts

2.Details

First of all I thank to Public Climate School 24 / University Augsburg Prof Peter Kaisiske and writings of Prof Stefanie Bock Marburg and Prof Markus Wagner Giessen Marburg.

I dont want to do any crime but if I want to visit a bank then I leave the law treaty.And finally I cannot be accused on that.I dont accept your law and your court…Or I declare a communistical philosophy…How this can be ? iewing people like Donald Trump but not less Putin ignoring law and environment we must change this now.Its for all and evrybody ! In Eu we have a frame law without local details since March 2024 on that for all members of the Eu.To develope a seperate court makes no sense to me.Its a signal and this court has authority.

Like I wrote To Pik Potsdam in 2024 I dont think that Prof Andres Leverman is completelly right with his proposal to use room better follw to rules even if there is evidence that there ca be growth under worst restrictions.I think we can use our possibilities much better obeing to ecological rules.I think our capitalism is much more effective than planification.But it destroys resources for private egoism.As far I could understand we need in fact economical growth to pay finaces.It has to be much more than you got.Its not enough to have modernisation.We have developed recycling and repair economy instead of throw away economy.This is much better.But in the end I think we must develope another financement acause our earth is limited in last consequence.Its not communism.This doesnt work.I think its a challange for best theoretical minds to make it better reforming our system.Adam Smith ,them Keynes has to be social and in next step ecological and rthan without necessity of huge growth as far as I can get or estimate.For narrow minded: Its not a situation to make money the most with weapons,drugs ,prostitutes ,buying the world and evrybody for payed alternative religious facts,or with diamonds,gold,speculation,slaves or fossil fuel ,not even with honest good ideas and inventions,it’s soon a scenario how to survive reasonably on earth alltogether best,living and doing bussines without handeling one cathastrophe after the other loosing much more instead avoiding an economical breakdown too. What do you think about it ? Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck

Two important Professors didnt sent their material to me.I wrote it down in Puclic Climate school 2024 at Augsburg UNA my old University concerning law,but by hand probably with mistakes and not realy completelly.On was the friendly goodlooking Prof Sina Fontana.Im a little bit sad on private level.Its my norrmal level…In the end I checked the internet…You got almost evrything at parents for future and deutsche Umwelthilfe…..pdf

Further I checked my university a few years old books on Geography and Meterology…Sometimes I have to sleep sorry…Much more work.Result for you : 28% of the energy of the sun is sent back in space by clouds,22% is absorbed by athmosphere of earth.Rest of the energy is reaching earth soil.Small waves / energy light are setting molecules in movement.This is heating.This makes soil and water warmer.Higher temperature is more energy as stormes and more water in athmosphere.86% of water in the atmosphere comes out of the sea only 14% is comeing from the continents.But 22% of the water in athmosphere is pouring down etc on the continents for physical reasons especially mountains.Therefore continents get more and more water.Therefore we have theese floods now and more and more incredible storms.Water as clouds in athmosphere and other gasses like co2 are isolateing world concerning long wave emmission back to space.Methan gas is 3 times as effective as Co2 resulting by cows as fart and other animals.In Sibiria / Russia and probably in Greenland a huge amount of Methan gas is frozen in the soil as permafrost.With higher temerature it comres to the atmosphere as most intensive climate gas stopping other frequenzies of energy .Without that heat would leave earth as long waves energy.This is global warming in a nutshell.( Books : Meteorologie / Hans Häckel : Geographie / Gebhardt,Glaser,Radtke,Reuber,Vött )

I know that France has decided to use their nukes ( 75% of their energy supply ) as nuklear power for treaty of Paris ecological duties of 1,5 degree celsius border.I know they have no other choice in short time horizon.In Germany oit makes no sense and nuklear uranium for us was from Russia too.Old technique with huge problems but same dependacne.Challenging right wing populist Friedrich Merz / CDU said with Bavarian CSU right wing Söder that he is in favor for Fusion technology.There is a European unit ITER….In fact its a good plan for future.But up to now after 80 years of research we have for the first time a bit more energy as result as we putted in and its a lot of energy.Its not more than an idea absolutelly not working thosedays maybee in 50 years.Working is the armed version without control a h2 bomb.But not for energy production.Its riht to do research alltogether.But its wrong to give the impression that this is a real alternative for us ignoring CO2 etc restrictions etc in ear future.Its fooling voters to stop important laws saveing us with farytale.Nevertheless fusion enegrgy is a hope for future in the long run deserving money for research.Bavarian Chief Söder CSU enemy of the greeen ecological party tells us that there will be a bavarian fusion work.Maybeee in Jazz…I realy stress ITER of Europe is one of the largest research enterprises on Tokamak problems etc. This problem is realy to big for smal Bavaria….fooling faceing the greens and Co2 laws…Dont believe Donald Trumps.They are working with the dullest perfering their personal revenues….not earth and responsibility.

At www.instagram.com/o.f.d and www.tiktok.com/@ofd_oliverfredericdieck

youl find some teaching videos of mine in english and a lot in german language 5 up to 15 minutes each.One is concerning individual level to fight for Paris treaty Cop 1.5 degrees border aim.There is a lot more concerning economy and law.Economy is tzested cause I was advisor of President Bill Clinton in power via personal channel.His cousin Brenda Brunner was my girlfriend and I took a seldom extrem A level Abitur in Germany….Im shure that Bill was askimng almost evrybody.But my plan was not made by pressure groups.It was made by myself studeing economics,like Brenda did.It worked perfectly even in early version..

Global warming 1,5 degrees more : We must act cause there are tipping points in weather and ecosystems.We have a severe biodiversity loss to the max and we have climate change in dangerous intesity.Apart from that Nitrogen cycle is out if scale and maybee aerosol loading of athmosphere and chemical pollution too.Problem with tipping points is its an estimation based on climate models of different complexity and relatuiion to truth behavior of weather and other systems.We run computer simpulations testing and optimizeing it.But its not static its dynamic with interdependecies we dont know thosedays.We know we are on save ground cause we are surviveing.A scienfific estimation where danger begins is reducing uncertainity hopeing that we know enough avoiding cathstrophe.We have to be cautious enough. Without measures we are heading for 5 degrees more.5 degrees less was iceage.In that time the sea was 100 meter lower ! This change was in thousands of years therefore we could adapt and nature.Starting 100 years ago Co2 climate gas is exploding after millions of years of continuity with variations.Main source of Co2 is fossil fuel and coal.We must stop use for energy production / burning.Apart from that we need this for chemistry.
5 degrees more is the opposite.Up to 100 meters more.Certainly to much for most main cities at the coasts of earth.
First of all I thank concerning support by Prof Florian Diekert / Augsburg a reffering to Armstrong Mc Kay on tipping points 2022 and Prof Phillip Public climate school Augsburg 2024.

We cannot accept commercial private egoism destroying this world.We can only accept private egoism following to reasonable rules concerning rest of the world.We all know drug ,weapons slavery and prostitutes selling makes money.It will remain a crime.Concerning tipping points I can add there are stable balances and instable balances following to mathematical chao theory.A stable balance will turn back to normal scale if you are stopping the action.Nature is recoverinng.But a lot of balances are not stable.They are instable.Probably its like that with gulf streams hich is much weaker.Without it its to cold in Great Britain Norway Sweenden Finnland Danmark to live there.Then they have ice age.Some hope that the effects will build a new balance in the lonhg run.But we dont know if its in 100 years or in 3000.Those tippingpoints are crucial.A big problem is the butterfly effect.A little little reason can escalate to a selvdriven huge effect witout any borders.For example if the output triggers the input.Most common. Dont put a microphone to the amp boxes.Otherwise you need a new Pa music system…This is the screaming realy loud..A hint for a tipping point is doubelling of periodicies near to cathastrophe and exponential growth.Exploding or imploding….both directions.Our climat catastrophees are signs for a breakdown of weather systems and the beginning of the mega cathastropee itself.If you have react now makeing the rules useing alternative techniques in future.Oliver

Cause we cant use exising fossil fuel and char coal any more trying to avoid cathastrophe for mankind civilisation and biodiversity ther must be a C02 carbon use tax for energy production .This tax is Pigouvian equaling the social costs of carbon.Nordhaus is proposing a tax of 40 USD with 3,5 degrees optimum and newer Hänsel is proposing a tax in 2022 of 200 USD.Reason for the difference is the dicount for importance of future.One argument is hope for better technique.Second reason is personal egoism and worth of children and mankind in the log run individually.Most modern is evaluation of same importance of now and later.And I agree. For details i thank to Prof Florian Diekert Augsburg / public climate school 2024.

Cause Methan gas is 3 times more effective / dangerous as Co2 but away in about 10 years in athomosphere this is a second important lever to change situation dynamically.Therefore I propose a second tax on methan polution severe punishment and whole co2 management as analogon inclusively.This could be a game changer…

I think its a good idea to try to filter out riseing methan gasses for different use in big animal farms if they are not outside to filter / waiting what they produce before you put it on the fields forced by international law.Maybee this can reduce the amout of Methan polution by agriculture effectively with acceptable costs.

Faceing climate cathastrophees its not acceptable to use ineffective and dirty fracking and brown coal at least.Its more or less a crime.On the other hand I know that in East Germany for example people are requesting alternative jobs voteing for dullhead Nazi climate ignorants otherwise.First you have to create other possibilities of acceptable income in brown coal regions as far as I can see…

Naturally its a duty in my view to plant as much trees etc and to protect as possible for evrybody.

Faceing climate events like never before we must act stopping criminals in gouvernments by treaties and law punishment.Do it.I propose a criminals tax on market for Elon Musk Tessla car enterprises / Trump plans or others if neccessary maybee less to cheap BYD cars protecting environment. Good work at Baku cop 29.

Sincerly your Oliver Frederic Dieck – Germany Augsburg / Munich

PS: Like I wrote To Pik Potsdam in 2024 I dont think that Prof Andres Leverman is completelly right with his proposal to use room better following to rules even if there is evidence that there can be growth under worst restrictions.I think we can use our possibilities much better obeing to ecological rules.I think our capitalism is much more effective than planification.But it destroys resources for private egoism.As far I could understand we need in fact economical growth to pay finaces.It has to be much more than you got.Its not enough to have modernisation.We have developed recycling and repair economy instead of throw away economy.This is much better.But in the end I think we must develope another financement acause our earth is limited in last consequence.Its not communism.This doesnt work.I think its a challange for best theoretical minds to make it better reforming our system.Adam Smith ,them Keynes has to be social and in next step ecological and rthan without necessity of huge growth as far as I can get or estimate.For narrow minded: Its not a situation to make money the most with weapons,drugs ,prostitutes ,buying the world and evrybody for payed alternative religious facts,or with diamonds,gold,speculation,slaves or fossil fuel ,not even with honest good ideas and inventions,it’s soon a scenario how to survive reasonably on earth alltogether best,living and doing bussines without handeling one cathastrophe after the other loosing much more instead avoiding an economical breakdown too. What do you think about it ? Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck

Thankyou concerning Public Climate School / Augsburg UNA 2024 my old Law university.Only two important Augsburg Professors didnt sent their material to me.I wrote it down in Puclic Climate school 2024 at Augsburg UNA my old University concerning law,but by hand probably with mistakes and not realy completelly.One was the friendly goodlooking Prof Sina Fontana.Im a little bit sad on private level.Its my norrmal level…In the end I checked the internet…You got almost evrything at parents for future and deutsche Umwelthilfe too…..pdf

Further I checked a few years old books on Geography and Meterology…Sometimes I have to sleep sorry…Much more work.Result for you : 28% of the energy of the sun is sent back in space by clouds,22% is absorbed by athmosphere of earth.Rest of the energy is reaching earth soil.Small waves energy light are setting molecules in movement.This is heating.This make soil and water warmer.Higher temperature is more energy as stormes and more water in athmosphere.86% of water in the atmosphere comes out of the sea only 14% is comeing from the continents.But 22% of the water in athmosphere is pouring down on the continents for physical reasons.Therefore continents get more and more water.Therefore we have theese floods now and more and more incredible storms.Water as clouds in athmosphere and other gasses like co2 are isolateing world concerning long wave emmission back to space.Without that heat would leave earth as long waves energy.Then its not possible.This is global warming in a nutshell.( Books : Meteorologie / Hans Häckel : Geographie / Gebhardt,Glaser,Radtke,Reuber,Vött )

I know that France has decided to use their nukes ( 75% of their energy supply ) as nuklear power for treaty of Paris ecological duties of 1,5 degree celsius border.I know they have no other choice in short time horizon.In Germany oit makes no sense and nuklear uranium for us was from Russia too.Old technique with huge problems but same dependacne.Challenging right wing populist Friedrich Merz / CDU said with Bavarian CSU right wing Söder that he is in favor for Fusion technology.There is a European unit ITER….In fact its a good plan for future.But up to now after 80 years of research we have for the first time a bit more energy as result as we putted in and its a lot of energy.Its not more than an idea absolutelly not working thosedays maybee in 50 years.Working is the armed version without control a h2 bomb.But not for energy production.Its riht to do research alltogether.But its wrong to give the impression that this is a real alternative for us ignoring CO2 etc restrictions etc in ear future.Its fooling voters to stop important laws saveing us with farytale.Nevertheless fusion enegrgy is a hope for future in the long run deserving money for research.Bavarian Chief Söder CSU enemy of the greeen ecological party tells us that there will be a bavarian fusion work.Maybeee in Jazz…I realy stress ITER of Europe is one of the largest research enterprises on Tokamak problems etc. This problem is realy to big for smal Bavaria….fooling faceing the greens and Co2 laws…Dont believe Donald Trumps.They are working with the dullest perfering their personal revenues….not earth and responsibility.

At www.instagram.com/o.f.d and www.tiktok.com/@ofd_oliverfredericdieck youl find some teaching videos of mine in english and a lot in german language 5 up to 15 minutes each.One is concerning individual level to fight for Paris treaty Cop 1.5 degrees border aim.There is a lot more concerning economy and law.Economy is tzested cause I was advisor of President Bill Clinton in power via personal channel.His cousin Brenda Brunner was my girlfriend and I took a seldom extrem A level Abitur in Germany….Im shure that Bill was askimng almost evrybody.But my plan was not made by pressure groups.It was made by myself studeing economics,like Brenda did.It worked perfectly even in early version.

cop29 cop30 #cop16 #baku #un #unitednations #eu #usa #greenpeace #university #students #climatejustice #globalwarming #news #una #universitätaugsburg #fridaysforfuture #nachrichten #environment #icc #internationalcriminalcourt #wwf #press #luisaneubauer #talk #tv #gouvernment #supremecourt #economics #oliverfredericdieck #spd #diegrünen #gretathunberg #carlareemtsma #PublicClimateSchool #G20

Yesterday we saw at Donald Trump Whithouse Silensky Ukraine,Starmer Great Britain,Meloni Italia,Stubb Finnland,Merz Germany,Rutte Nato General Secretary,von der Leyen EU,Macron France speaking to each other.This is at least only way and a success following to Willy Brandt SPD Democrats chief of Internationale,Nobel Price.style was acceptable.On the other hand we saw glitter for Donald Trump theater giving the Nobel Price owner as right wing enemy of United Nations,international law,courts and especially Europe.

Following to pressure of jewish Silensky Ukraine and jewish Donald Trump both born in racistical strict jewish world we cutt all friendship and economy bridges grown after great Gorbatchew with huge economical and political problems.Diplomacy and succes of last 40 years is off.We have a situation worse than in cold war in the beginning of the 80s when I entered high politics obviously as test for strict jews but also for UN hight much more friendly…My personal life is connected to this developement of last 40 years.My influence and independance was a big part of it even if I detect that strict jews said killing hes not natural he is a second world war weapon….My unknown father was in his youth chief of one Waffen SS tank as far as I know and this was public.Situaztion is precisely like with Günther Grass Nobel price owner SPD and pope Benedict as originally Mr. Ratzinger….But in that time this was secret….I am extremly honest and intelligent.But im not God or holy.Therefore I think UN…. was much more fair to me checking me and my real completelly natural European traits without hate originally….. In my personal sourounding there were not much real friends…Within aunt of Luisa Neubauer Reemtsma Elke Dittmann ( school ) following to her Neubauer now married with biggest tabacco enterprise Germany Reemtsma…She wanted to know if she is living in South Africa ( Botha etc ) ….Those told to me faceing me then we must go… Im genius of the century ultra stable and those are faked and more or less mad saying thankyou steeling with brutality for my truth.They dindt accept that Im simple Social democrat with Realo Green points.Affront ! Pure racism in my view without laws…My life….

We had Minsk treaty,we had Minsk 2 treaty,earth concerning co2 is ruinated,war is back,Russia is like it was in Breshniew times,rms reduction is off,peacefull neighbourship is off,big parts of Ukraine are devasted and occupied,a lot of people are dead,UN is weaked
,Europe was weaked without Great Britain 4th bigest nuclear power after France.Our friedship to China produceing goods has to stay behind cause of war ruinateing us.As result we buy Donald Trump weapons,Donald Trump car mill,Donald Trump truth,Donald Trump vaseline,Donald Trump fracking oil and no plastic ar Paris climate treaty.Russia is depening on oil and gas but friends of Donald Trump too…Us is interested in Krim cause of stretegical importance with Schwarzmeer fleet Mediterean sea Mittel meer Black sea and Asowsh sea concerning strategy and economical bargaining.For Russia this is a shift witch is to big as far as I know…. Simply a provocation.Ukraine cant live as far as I know without most strong regions occupied by Russia cause its economical center of Ukraine more or less…Peace ? Peae is a good thing.But nobody need Donald Trumps mad plan to get Greenland etc.A new Peace of Versailles this time for Ukraine not for unbeaten Germany cannot happen after all .

In my view it costs Krim at least for a while and part automomie in those regions in Ukraine where more Russians are living before of war….and last but not least Neutralisation or a delay concerning Nato entry at least to be realistical.And not a Kotau in the as of Putin as real winner or in Trumps as in same time…Hitler Stalin pact or Hitler Mussolini ? ….Its new feudalism eliminateing state and democracy.Remember a king ! You are not allowed to show your as to the king.Its forbitten.You have to leave the king putting your bam through the door at first showing your friendly face to the king only.Otherwise head cuttof…At best you are lying on the ground putting your feet at first through the door kissing the ground and naturally the kings ass…cause you are nothing less than a rich mad dullhead.This was old order of kings and emperors… French revolution was ending this style in Europe stressing human personal equal rights.USA is based on French Revolution too.

I am against a similar security guarantee like Nato membership cause of Art 5 Nato treaty.Third world war…automatically.But to send international soldiers to keep peace ,this is maybee a good idea after a treaty.Now Im at my major point :

Germany will send soldiers under United nations decision and resolution.France too I get Britain will decide too like that if possible.Where is United Nations ,international law,UN security scouncil, with independant right to deal in this way.Its not Donald Trump shitting on all that.A criminal like Putin or Nithanjahu.We will follow to United Nnations international law decisions and resulutions..Honest UN General Secretary Antonio Guterres take the lead.Its your job.UN General assembly work !

Sincerly and nevertheless with best wishes Oliver Frederic Dieck – Germany genius of the century and not somebody else.

PS : Donald Trump was involved in test to torture and exchange probably biggest genius on earth me argumenting with strict jewish believe and blood and second world war in my innerst circle unfortunatelly sine 1985 !!!! ( Pjotr Peter Schmidt swim teacher in Palm Beach at Donald Trump.Peters parents are saying same mill like Donald Trump and maximum east sedler extremists of Israel.His girlfriend was Elke Dittmann at School in private Elke Neubauer Reemtsma,following to her.Aunt of Luisa Neubauer in three versions.I gues on private level evrything is faked there out of this.I am me bymyself.Content is ok.And im still not a gay.looking for a wife who is not istalled by secret service mill…)

#diplomacy #eu #un #nato #macron #starmer #merz #weu # news #press #nachrichten #journal #newspaper #nouvelles #lemondediplomatique #unesco #peacenobelprice #ungeneralsecretary #antonioguterres #unsecuritycoucil #embassy #student #germany #international law #internationalcourt #internationalpenalcourt #foreignaffairs #msc #ungeneralassembly #economy #cop30 #plastictreaty #ungenava #ecocide #genocide #waraggression #oliverfredericdieck #ofd

This Ukraine – Russia friday summit is against Plastic treaty obviously to avoid any progress concentrating all press to the other problem.Both USA and Russia are mega producers of oil and gas etc…

Therefore in addition most important on this UN treaty on plastics :

Plastic made out of oil thosedays is quite often best technical solution.Sometimes for environment too.For better technical solutions we have maybee a little bit time.But

We need immidiatelly forbitting of car plastic tires.We need a law requesting car tires made of natural redegradable plastic,cause all that goes into the sea and our nature….

We need immiditally forbitting to do plastic combustion plant or into the sea.It must be a duty for chemical or physical recycling .

To do recycling we cant have those plastic inventions in several layers wich cant be recycled.It has to be a plan for recycling if it is on market to get admission.

This is what nature and earth requests immidiatelly as first step

Please sign something like rthat at least to move forward and do a short range time table please..In name of mankind.In addition we need ecocide law agaibst people who throw evrything into the open sea immidiatelly.Sincerly Oliver – bac to topic :

I thank to the European statement concerning this with 5 points of importance in talk with Ukraine Silensky in role of lawyer if the subject….Short : I do my duty as best as I can without power if office useing my influence independence and freedim of soeech in whole Europe.My peace proposal probably much to late after all thst war and brutality :

Its normal that there ares no weapons in action during negotiations.On the other hand this is not of major importance.A matter of style .

My proposal is that Ukraine accepts the Black sea Schwarzmeer fleet of Russia with their access to Asowsch sea and Mittelmeer Mediterean European sea also concerning economical ships cause of the major strategical importance at the Krim half island.But following to Willy Brandt SPD with old DDR east Germany without accepting new law standard or change concerning this.Only as workaround to handle real situation.

In addition I propose partial autonomie in those parts of Ukraine witch are concerning people and culture russian in majority based on situation before of war aggression.

Apart from that Russia should withdraw and Ukraine remains free Ukraine.

Maybee a delay of Nato entry of Ukraine would be a good idea to to make it real.

This could work idf its not much too late.I did my duty.Do yours in name of mankind Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck Germany .

PS : Thank you Douglas Bokowoy Munich Cia embassy english german translater native speaker from Illinoy.I called you an as after your Gooood ! for an essay on european and american philosopers in comparisson with indoctrinateing question. We are friends thanks for english teaching.Within class son of General and later Prime minister israel Ariel Sharon Gregor following to him also my former neighbour in Munich..Greetings to Brenda Brunner cousin of US Democrats President Bill Clinton.She was my girlfriend after getting rather seldom german elite abitur baccalaureat A – level in Munich Bavaria 1987 signed offcially.Bill Clinton was Harwards best of the year…oli

#diplomacy #europe #eu #ukraine #russia #nato #weu #deal #negotiations #un #press #nachrichten #alaska #plastictreaty #ungeneralsecretary #bundesregierung #news #genava #environment #ecocide #greenpeace #wwf #ungenava #oliverfredericdieck #fridaysforfuture #parentsforfuture

Dear general secretary United Nations Antonio Guterres ,dear UN General assembly dear cop30 at Bresil dear concerence for a UN plastic treaty as analogon to Paris treaty on CO2 climate change of 2015 :

Im a genius of the century punished by dull religious raceists as German Lutheran christ and scientist.Im still in the left midst Social Democrats / Realo Greens and i want to behave within international law.

In Germany and whole Europe you have the right to express quite clear your political opinion concerning somebody.But raceism is forbitten and crimes.It has to be a political criticism with political measures.

Thosedays you are negotiateing concerning a plastic ban or regulation treaty which is most important move since treaty of Paris 2015 cop21.In a few month you will try to get important results against oil and coal industry stopping global heating saveing our world in a climate which is managable for mankind and plants and animals.1,5 degrees !

Almost evry being mankind inclusvely contains a lot of plastic even in his brains now.A lot of animals in the see are dying out.In pacific ocean there is a huge isle build by plastic.Should we try to build a new continent with that ? On the other hand we could take it out of the sea…

Its true that we have to do the changes without crashing our industries.But this is only possible if we are useing time for a smooth adaptation with better technology not resisting on old techniques like char coal,diesel and otto engine cars…or airplanes .we have to move forward and not to late for egoistical reasons like Trump and his friends ignoring evrything apart from old industry ( his and his friends investments ) and his banking account….As earlier we are as less revolution as less economical crash as smoother neccessary changes with economical huge oportunities….Keep a stiff lipp.Earth must stay together resolving our biggest problems !

https://unfccc.int/cop30

Global Climate Action UN Climate Change

At the United Nations Climate Change conference in Paris, COP 21, governments agreed that mobilizing stronger and more ambitious climate action is urgently required to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. Action must come from governments, cities, regions, businesses and investors. Everyone has a role to play in effectively implementing the Paris Agreement.

The Paris Agreement formally acknowledges the urgent need to scale up our global response to climate change, which supports even greater ambition from governments. The commitments from all actors are recognized in the decision text of the Paris Agreement, including those launched through the Lima–Paris Action Agenda.

COP 21
At COP 21 in Paris in 2015, it was agreed that mobilizing stronger and more ambitious climate action by all Parties and non-Party stakeholders was urgently required to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. In decision 1/CP.21, the commitments from all actors are recognized, including those launched through the Lima–Paris Action Agenda, as well as the urgent need to scale up the global response to climate change and support greater ambition from governments. Parties also recognized the value of having climate champions to ensure a durable connection between the Convention and the many voluntary and collaborative actions. In Paris they decided that two high-level champions shall be appointed representing the current COP Presidency and the incoming COP Presidency, turning into practice an initiative that saw climate champions from Peru, France and Morocco help pave the way for success in Paris.

Post COP 21
Since adoption of the Paris Agreement, global climate action has been encouraged and facilitated under the banner of the Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action, which was agreed in Morocco at COP 22 and acknowledged at subsequent Conferences of the Parties. The Partnership brings together in stakeholders working in key sectors and themes to spur enhanced climate ambition and action, and then recognizes that action, to inspire greater effort…..

My private research on plastic and CO2:

I am extremely concerned about subject of waste and apparent plastic recycling (chemical, etc.) and, more specifically, incineration. I think they should define approximately four types of packaging plastic that are single-layer and sorted by type, where no other option is possible for technical reasons plastic best choice , and mankind should ban the rest unless it consists of self-degradable plastic made from renewable materials now and not build by petrol.

Next up is COP 30 Brazil on the Paris Climate Agreement. We urgently need another agreement on plastic, etc., waste, and dumping in the oceans. In addition to certain algae, seaweed fields such as moors can apparently store or convert a great deal of CO2. Seagrass mats (lay them down!) improve flora and fauna without land loss, as is the case with rewetted moors.Protect rainforests and other forests . All four options must be done.Maybee we can take out Co2 useing technique.But I think its probably expensive and not effective enough to press it in the soil etc.I think controlled nature seeweed ,wood,certain algae are cheap and more effective. as far as I know..

I myself wanted to become a chemist until I was 16, with the biggest chemistry set (Kosmos), until I almost blew up the house I made plastic from milk oeco casein myself… Here is my research from the internet at scientiffic sources about alternative plastic materials:

Galalith is made from milk (its name comes from the Greek words gala, meaning milk, and lithos, meaning stone). It is a polymer, i.e. a material composed of many identical subunits. Galalith has similar physical properties to many plastics that have been in use since the 20th century, but it is biodegradable. Bioplastics such as galalith could help reduce the environmental impact of the production and disposal of petroleum-based plastics.

Special biodegradable polymers that can decompose under the influence of microorganisms. Examples of polymers include those made from starch, sugar cane, etc., including polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs).

What are bioplastics?
www.european-bioplastics.org
Mass balance approach to accelerate the use of renewable raw materials in chemical processes (January 2020)

“Bio” plastics raise false hopes
It sounds promising: so-called “bio” plastics, which are made from renewable raw materials and simply rot away instead of polluting nature. Unfortunately, however, such biodegradable or “bio-based” plastics are not automatically sustainable.

The “bio” label is often misused as a marketing strategy and raises false expectations among consumers. “Bio” plastics are currently only a pseudo-solution to the plastic crisis. The first goal in response to the plastic crisis is and remains the avoidance of unnecessary

The primary goal in response to the plastic crisis is and remains the avoidance of unnecessary plastic applications, especially in the packaging and disposable sectors.

From the perspective of BUND, the often heated debate about the use and potential advantages of “bio” plastics mainly distracts from the necessary restructuring of the packaging and plastics sectors in general. The focus should be on using much less plastic overall and recycling with as little loss as possible.

Bio-based plastics? Land is limited!
Let’s take a closer look at the bio-plastic bag: it is often made from renewable raw materials such as corn starch. The term “renewable raw materials” conjures up the illusion that these are unlimited resources. This is a misconception. The production of plant-based raw materials consumes soil, fertilizer, and often pesticides.

On the one hand, there is a risk of competition for land with food production and, on the other hand, the conversion of extensively used land to intensively used land. Disposable tableware, for example, is often made from sugar cane. Given the current high demand and unfair land distribution in Brazil, its cultivation is leading to a wave of conversions of former cattle pastures into intensively used monocultures by a few large corporations. This has serious negative consequences for the indigenous population, the local environment, and the climate.

Biodegradable plastics? Composting is disposal!
Furthermore, a considerable amount of energy is required to produce “bio” plastic bags, for example. This energy is completely lost during composting. No plant nutrients are produced either. Decomposition is therefore purely a form of disposal. “Bio” plastic also leads to the continuous production of new disposable products.

In addition, “bio” plastic bags are not actually composted in practice because they take too long to decompose in composting plants. In organic waste, they are almost indistinguishable from conventional plastic bags, so they are sorted out and incinerated. This is absolutely not “bio,” but rather a destruction of resources and a waste of energy. Furthermore, the existing standards for the degradation of biodegradable plastics tolerate residual microplastic particles and do not sufficiently take into account the possible negative toxicological effects of the chemicals they contain on humans and the environment.

Similar poor ecological balance to conventional plastic
In principle, today’s bio-based plastics do not have a better ecological balance than conventional plastics. “Bio” plastics contain just as many unknown and sometimes harmful chemicals as conventional plastics, meaning that composting or general littering in the environment poses risks to humans and the environment.

There is currently no material recycling for chemically novel “bio” plastics, as this is not profitable. Manufacturers should therefore limit themselves to a few different types in the future. Chemically identical “drop-in polymers” can already be recycled in plants today.

Single-use plastic stands for a throwaway culture – a rethink is needed!
Half of all “bio” plastic production is used for disposable packaging – so there’s a lot of potential for savings here. The idea that “bio” plastic can simply be thrown away because it will rot anyway promotes a throwaway and wasteful culture. However, waste prevention and environmental protection begin with avoiding unnecessary products and packaging.

For high-quality, durable applications where the use of plastics makes sense, “bio” plastics can be a good alternative. Otherwise, the following applies, especially to packaging: Only uniform reusable and “unpackaged” products represent real climate and resource protection.

In addition our European Supply chain law etc from the Internet:

The EU Supply Chain Act, officially known as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), requires companies to respect human rights and environmental standards in their global supply chains and to prevent harm. It aims to ensure that companies are held accountable for violations of these standards, even if they occur in their supply chains abroad.

Key aspects of the EU Supply Chain Act:

Scope:

The law will be introduced in stages and will apply to companies with more than 1,000 employees and annual revenues exceeding €450 million from 2032 onwards.

Due diligence obligations:

Companies must identify and mitigate risks in their supply chains, comply with human rights and environmental standards, introduce grievance procedures, and report on sustainability.

Climate protection:

Companies must draw up plans to bring their business model into line with the Paris Climate Agreement and strive for climate neutrality.

Liability:

Companies can be held civilly liable for violations of due diligence obligations and may be required to pay damages.

Enforcement:

The European Union will establish supervisory authorities to monitor compliance with the law and impose sanctions.

there are differences from the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).

Oliver Frederic Dieck : Last but not least my personal adds : In Bavaria Germany old version is to eat quality flesh most of the time more eccological porc or chicken at the weekend.Especially in Vienna and Austria but also in Bavaria we have „Mehlspeisen “ I cant translate this Try it : Knoedel with Steinpilz,Millirahmstrudel,Apfelstrudel,Auszogene,Schupfnudeln,Pancake,Dampfnudel etc etc.It tastes verry well…During the week there are vegetables apart from Spargel Aspargus.and noodles. And at Friday there is fish ! Its not neccessary to eat Fenchel witch makes more boobs even for men or Tofu.On the other hand a lot of regions on earth have other problems.They want to eat to stay alive.Weakend is haveing enough to eat….we must help ! But developed part of earth in peace probably you can behave more reasonable within your traditions too. Honorable Prof Anders Levermann Pik Potsdam Germany and member of the UN climate council is right with his book Faltung der Welt.Behind him Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber ,Prof Stefan Rahmsdorf ,Ottmar Endenhofer PIk Director and Itamar Procadccia etc is right in his differenced pedagogical discussion.But even if I have read some hints : In short range we can respect some rules more with growth and prosperity in deed.But in the long range on one earth we must rethink the system changeing to a recycle system without necessity of huge growth for revenue and financement of efforts in my view and this is not easy.Maybee we can alter the system to repair earth and its resources with changed system witch needs less growth with more result effect.Today its the same. Growth is progress and economical wealth.A structural problem…in the long run as far as I can get.Who can resolve this problem deserves the nobel price for economy which comes not by Alfred Nobel but by Americans each year given to Americans…neutrally.Keep a stiff lipp. Luisa Neubauer of Fridays for future ( and others female equalty terrorists inclusively ) : Im completelly normal genius of the century in several fields goodlooking especially approximatelly 20 years younger for biological pure natural reasons searching for a beautiful wife for familly.Not evrybody is trans or gay.Please dont fool your friends .Inside of my woman there is absolutelly no nightmare like Donald Trump for a while.Im at home at her……

We need the new tool ECOCIDE in international criminal court to save the world concerning ecological bandits if its CO2 ,plastic or else.Do it !

Im shure you are allowed to sing my United nations Anthem Proposal Peace is a win of culture ! Youl find the text and music at soundcloud window on my music site

http://www.o-f-d.de

L’ets sing !

Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck Germany,Munich Augsburg
genius of the century and tortured discriminated for decades several times robbed…

www.instagram.com/o.f.d

#ecocide #plastic #un #genava #suiss #eu #un #unesco #co2 #cop30 #bresil #pik #news nachrichten #nouvelles #fridays forfuture #parentsforfuture #court #unitednations #algae #seeweed #moore #wood #rainforest #generalassembly #humanrights #globalwarming #wwf #greenpeace #economy #university #universität #ungeneralsecretary #methan #summit #climate #nature #climatejustice #pope #ekd #church #supremecourt #oliverfredericdieck #psoe

Dear Europe Dear Eu commission dear prime ministers and ministers for foreign affairs as well as ministers for defense :

I read that former minister for foreign affairs Joschka Fischer / Greens is requesting a european nuclear shield too…President Macron is offering this for years.Basically this idea was my initiative too after Bush and Trump 1 reality.A strong WEU for Europe.In fact there was a reasonable and friendly Obama and a Biden.Therefore we stopped activities.but this was short horizon thinking…Macron with about 400 most modern nuke systems and Starmer Great Britain with 300 ( both veto world security council members and 3. and 4. strongest nuke owners on planet ) are able to talk about a European independant nuclear shield strong enough to protect us concerning Putin or else.I think this is best choice possible.It will work if Europe wants to pay a bit to France and Britain for this service….

Trump is free of intelligence and advisors showing experiance to him.Naturally protection taxes wil destroy global economy reduceing growth being mirrored complettely evry time like ever.But he is dull.

Viewing this intensity of brutal stupidity you realy should invest 800. billion to US warfare……you are buying EUROPEAN new systems ! Keep money in Europe !

Concerning European enterprises produceing in USA its probably best to return to European soil.This kind of president belonging to a clinic will declare your enterproses to USA in the end like he did with Greenland,Canada,Gaza,Jerusalem,Gulf of Mexico…..It makes no sense.You wanted to produce a new combat aircraft with France.Or Eurofighter system is one of the strongest on earth.In preace nobody needs the option of vector engines like F35 or yf22 USA has.But we developped it with NASA in joint venture….Its our right.Buy it. ! Its NONSENSE . But in the verry need think EUROPEAN .No dependecy of a mad or reasonable american or russian president.At best basically NO dependecy.Europe will reach adolescence !

PS : If Putin AND Trump are in prison or clinic we can go on more experianced with reasonable politics resolveing most important problems of mankind in team like climate problem ,peace ,starvation by hunger and so on.If you dont hav it read books like Guerillia deals.In books like that Donald Trump is the example for mad terrorist bargainer as method.No win win.His customers hate him and will accept one time only.Like with Mafia…Not in Whithouse.I strictly prefer Prof Daniel Shapiro – Negotiate ! from Haward.He is reasonable belonging to this level with helpful advises.

Integrate in all of your thoughts UNITED NATIONS UN and Security Council.INTERNATIONAL LAW and act stricly within this frame ! I would prefere a UN based security platform as far as possible.Law and justice not brutal force instead. like in stone age of Trump / Putin.Peace is a win of culture ! ( Un anthem proposal )

Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck / Germany

www.instagram.com/o.f.d
www.tiktok.com/@ofd_oliverfredericdieck
www.o-f-d.de ….
http://aurora.o-f-d.com

#eu #unitednations #un #nato #weu #macron #starmer #defense #worldsecuritycouncil #msc #europeancommission #democrats #pes #spd #grüne #antonioguterres #vatican #ekd #protestants #climatejustice #gretathunberg #fridaysforfuture #sipri #nobelprize #news #nouvelles #nachrichten #press #pope

Dear Prime Minister Starmer / Great Britain and negotiation group on Ukraine :

Faceing most intense diplomacy problems since second world war in Europe I want to add some thoughts for a solution :

I want to ask Mr President Silensky / Urkraine some things at first :

What would be a lasting peace for you with Russia and what is a lasting peace for Russia in your estimation :

How do you see the russian position.What you can understand of Russian position.What you would accept in their position.What is realy important for Russia in fact and in which points you can move to respect legal or reasonable interests .

What is your red line.Which are your most holy points for Ukraine without any discussion.And which points are most holy for Russians in your estimation.

Where you can offer things for a compromise in reality.And what is holy sacred for both of negotiators…

I hope that this can help.German Minister for foreign affairs / SPD democrats was one of my aims in history in ultra conservative Bavaria…..

PS : Last but not least : You want to reinstall a multilateral world of international law….Then integrate United Nations as far as possible.Antonio Guterres !

Thankyou Starmer.It seems that you are reintegrateing Great Britain in Europe on political and arms level at least.Do you want to join a WEU within Nato as European idependant force ? This would be pretty strong in fact.Me bymyself i want to keep best techniques at home for our own security .we had peace…All what we can give apart from Taurus destroying Kremlin for shure ( 3.worldwar ) is ok. USA has to help without a bill…its not bargaining on market.its politics.We dont need a new arms race and cold war.we need reason peace and working together to stop climate problem in fact.Putin and Trump have other weapons and fuel plans..

Best wishes and peace .

Oliver Frederic Dieck
www.Instagram.com/o.f.d

#unitednations #starmer #ukrainesummit #europe #eu #peacenegotiations #pes #democrats #nato #weu #macron #olafscholz #annalenabaerbock #grüne #tusk #meloni #france #worldsecuritycouncil #oliverfredericdieck #fridaysforfuture #kajakallas #vonderleyen #diplomacy

First of all : Peace is a win of culture ! – your UN Anthem as pdf with text ( piano version or string quartett like you want – my proposal from 2008 now ready without any UN license or contract )

http://www.oliver-frederic-dieck.com/ofd-oliverfredericdieck-music-musique-musik-composer-compositeur-komponist-online/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Peaceisawinofculture-Un-athem-proposal.pdf

We have to act on earth to protect mankind biodiversity and earth how we know it.It cannot be that we will suffer in future concerning one cathastrophe after the other instead of working living consuming raising our children cause of criminal stubborn ignorant billionaire egoists makeing money.We must install rules forcing to reason.

The Stop Ecocide initiative / Foundation by Jojo Metha to change Rome Statute / ICC – international crime court :

4 possible accuses with ICC now for members only ( not USA / China … ) :

Nr.1 Extinction of People ( Art 6 Rome statute )
Nr.2 Crime against humanity ( Art 7 Rome statute )
Nr.3 War crime ( Art8 Rome statute )
Nr.4 Agression in form of war ( Art 8 bis Rome statute)

In addition thosedays still accepted :

Following Art 8 abs 2 litb Zifir Rome statute war crime is if enviroment is dammaged intensively for war goals.
Further : Based on lex lata Unesco / UN against Al Mahdi destroying of cultural worthes.Environment as entity is still accepted by ICC but not standing alone for itself and its maybee a similar problem like Cultural worthes for judicative and legislative.An argument for a accuse Nr.5 :

Nr.5 (New) Stop ecocide initiative .Legal definition proposal :

1.For the purpose of this Statute, “ecocide” means unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is
a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by
those acts

2.Details

First of all I thank to Public Climate School 24 / University Augsburg Prof. Dr. Peter Kasiske and writings of Prof Stefanie Bock Marburg and Prof Markus Wagner Giessen Marburg.

I dont want to do any crime but if I want to visit a bank then I leave the law treaty.And finally I cannot be accused on that.I dont accept your law and your court…Or I declare a communistical philosophy…How this can be ? iewing people like Donald Trump but not less Putin ignoring law and environment we must change this now.Its for all and evrybody ! In Eu we have a frame law without local details since March 2024 on that for all members of the Eu.To develope a seperate court makes no sense to me.Its a signal and this court has authority.

Like I wrote To Pik Potsdam in 2024 I dont think that Prof Andres Leverman is completelly right with his proposal to use room better follw to rules even if there is evidence that there can be growth under worst restrictions.I think we can use our possibilities much better obeying to ecological rules.I think our capitalism is much more effective than planification.But it destroys resources for private egoism.As far I could understand we need in fact economical growth to pay finaces.It has to be much more than you got.Its not enough to have modernisation.We have developed recycling and repair economy instead of throw away economy.This is much better.But in the end I think we must develope another financement cause our earth is limited in last consequence.Its not communism.This doesnt work.I think its a challange for best theoretical minds to make it better reforming our system.Adam Smith ,then Keynes has to be social and in next step ecological and than without necessity of huge growth as far as I can get or estimate.For criminals and the narrow minded: Its not a situation to make money the most with weapons,drugs ,prostitutes ,buying the world and evrybody for payed alternative religious facts,or with diamonds,gold,speculation,slaves or fossil fuel ,not even with honest good ideas and inventions,it’s soon a scenario how to survive reasonably on earth alltogether best,living and doing bussines without handeling one cathastrophe after the other loosing much more instead avoiding an economical breakdown too. What do you think about it ? Sincerly Oliver Frederic Dieck

Two important Professors didnt sent their material to me.I wrote it down in Puclic Climate school 2024 at Augsburg UNA my old University concerning law,but by hand probably with mistakes and not realy completelly.One was the friendly goodlooking Prof Sina Fontana.Im a little bit sad on private level cause this professor is female.Prof my standard level…In the end I checked the internet…You got almost evrything at parents for future and deutsche Umwelthilfe…..pdf

Further I checked my university a few years old books on Geography and Meterology…Sometimes I have to sleep sorry…Much more work.Result for you : 28% of the energy of the sun is sent back in space by clouds,22% is absorbed by athmosphere of earth.Rest of the energy is reaching earth soil.Small waves / energy light are setting molecules in movement.This is heating.This makes soil and water warmer.Higher temperature is more energy as stormes and more water in athmosphere.86% of water in the atmosphere comes out of the sea only 14% is comeing from the continents.But 22% of the water in athmosphere is pouring down etc on the continents for physical reasons especially mountains.Therefore continents get more and more water.Therefore we have theese floods now and more and more incredible storms.Water as clouds in athmosphere and other gasses like co2 are isolateing world concerning long wave emmission back to space.Methane gas CH4 is 3 times as effective as Co2 resulting by cows as fart and other animals.In Sibiria / Russia and probably in Greenland a huge amount of Methane gas CH4 is frozen in the soil as permafrost.With higher temerature it comres to the atmosphere as most intensive climate gas stopping other frequenzies of energy .Without that heat would leave earth as long waves energy.This is global warming in a nutshell.( Books : Meteorologie / Hans Häckel : Geographie / Gebhardt,Glaser,Radtke,Reuber,Vött )

I know that France has decided to use their nukes ( 75% of their energy supply ) as nuklear power for treaty of Paris ecological duties of 1,5 degree celsius border.I know they have no other choice in short time horizon.In Germany oit makes no sense and nuklear uranium for us was from Russia too.Old technique with huge problems but same dependacne.Challenging right wing populist Friedrich Merz / CDU said with Bavarian CSU right wing Söder that he is in favor for Fusion technology.There is a European unit ITER….In fact its a good plan for future.But up to now after 80 years of research we have for the first time a bit more energy as result as we putted in and its a lot of energy.Its not more than an idea absolutelly not working thosedays maybee in 50 years.Working is the armed version without control a h2 bomb.But not for energy production.Its right to do research alltogether.But its wrong to give the impression that this is a real alternative for us ignoring CO2 etc restrictions etc in ear future.Its fooling voters to stop important laws saveing us with farytale.Nevertheless fusion enegrgy is a hope for future in the long run deserving money for research.Bavarian Chief Söder CSU enemy of the greeen ecological party tells us that there will be a bavarian fusion work.Maybeee in Jazz…I realy stress ITER of Europe is one of the largest research enterprises on Tokamak problems etc. This problem is realy to big for smal Bavaria….fooling faceing the greens and Co2 laws…Dont believe Donald Trumps.They are working with the dullest perfering their personal revenues….not earth and responsibility.

At www.instagram.com/o.f.d and www.tiktok.com/@ofd_oliverfredericdieck

youl find some teaching videos of mine in english and a lot in german language 5 up to 15 minutes each.One is concerning individual level to fight for Paris treaty Cop 1.5 degrees border aim.There is a lot more concerning economy and law.Economy is tested cause I was advisor of President Bill Clinton in power via personal channel.His cousin Brenda Brunner was my girlfriend after I took a seldom extrem A level Abitur in Germany….Im shure that Bill was asking almost evrybody.But my plan was not made by pressure groups.It was made by myself studeing economics,like Brenda did.It worked perfectly even in early version..

Global warming 1,5 degrees more : We must act cause there are tipping points in weather and ecosystems.We have a severe biodiversity loss to the max and we have climate change in dangerous intesity.Apart from that Nitrogen cycle is out if scale and maybee aerosol loading of athmosphere and chemical polution too.Problem with tipping points is its an estimation based on climate models of different complexity and relation to truth behavior of weather and other systems.We run computer simulations testing and optimizeing it.But its not static its dynamic with interdependencies we dont know thosedays.We know we are on save ground cause we are surviveing.A scienfific estimation where danger begins is reducing uncertainity hopeing that we know enough avoiding cathstrophe.We have to be cautious enough. Without measures we are heading for 5 degrees more.5 degrees less was iceage.In that time the sea was 100 meter lower ! This change was in thousands of years therefore we could adapt and nature.Starting 100 years ago Co2 climate gas is exploding after millions of years of continuity with variations.Main source of Co2 is fossil fuel and coal.We must stop use for energy production / burning.Apart from that we need this for chemistry.
5 degrees more is the opposite.Up to 100 meters more .Certainly to much for most main cities at the coasts of earth.
First of all I thank concerning support by Prof Florian Diekert / Augsburg a reffering to Armstrong Mc Kay on tipping points 2022 and Prof Phillip Public climate school Augsburg 2024.

We cannot accept commercial private egoism destroying this world.We can only accept private egoism following to reasonable rules concerning rest of the world.We all know drug ,weapons slavery and prostitutes selling makes money.It will remain a crime.Concerning tipping points I can add there are stable balances and instable balances following to mathematical chaos theory.A stable balance will turn back to normal scale if you are stopping the action.Nature is recoverinng.But a lot of balances are not stable.They are instable.Probably its like that with gulf streams hich is much weaker.Without it its to cold in Great Britain Norway Sweeden Finnland Danmark to live there.Then they have ice age.Some hope that the effects will build a new balance in the lonhg run.But we dont know if its in 100 years or in 3000.Those tippingpoints are crucial.A big problem is the butterfly effect.A little little reason can escalate to a selvdriven huge effect witout any borders.For example if the output triggers the input.Most common. Dont put a microphone to the amp boxes.Otherwise you need a new Pa music system…This is the screaming realy loud.A hint for a tipping point is doubelling of periodicies near to cathastrophe and exponential growth.Exploding or imploding….both directions.Our climat catastrophees are signs for a breakdown of weather systems and the beginning of the mega cathastropee itself.If you have react now makeing the rules useing alternative techniques in future.Oliver

Cause we cant use exising fossil fuel and char coal any more trying to avoid cathastrophe for mankind civilisation and biodiversity ther must be a C02 carbon use tax for energy production .This tax is Pigouvian equaling the social costs of carbon.Nordhaus is proposing a tax of 40 USD with 3,5 degrees optimum and newer Hänsel is proposing a tax in 2022 of 200 USD.Reason for the difference is the dicount for importance of future.One argument is hope for better technique.Second reason is personal egoism and worth of children and mankind in the log run individually.Most modern is evaluation of same importance of now and later.And I agree. For details i thank to Prof Florian Diekert Augsburg / public climate school 2024.

New : Cause Methane gas CH4 is 3 times more effective / dangerous as Co2 but away in about 10 years in athomosphere this is a second important lever to change situation dynamically.Therefore I propose a second tax on methan polution severe punishment and whole co2 management as analogon inclusively.This could be a game changer…

I think its a good idea to try to filter out riseing methan gasses for different use in big animal farms if they are not outside to filter / waiting / easy methodes what they produce before you put it on the fields forced by international law.Maybee this can reduce the amout of Methan polution by agriculture effectively with acceptable costs.

Faceing climate cathastrophees its not acceptable to use ineffective and dirty fracking and brown coal at least.Its more or less a crime.On the other hand I know that in East Germany for example people are requesting alternative jobs voteing for dullhead Nazi climate ignorants otherwise.First you have to create other possibilities of acceptable income in brown coal regions as far as I can see…

Naturally its a duty in my view to plant as much trees etc and to protect as possible for evrybody to filter co2 and to produce oxygene instead.

Faceing climate events like never before we must act stopping criminals in gouvernments by treaties and law punishment.Do it.I propose a criminals tax on market for Elon Musk Tessla car enterprises / Trump plans or others if neccessary maybee less to cheap BYD cars only protecting environment. Good work at Baku cop 29.

Sincerly your Oliver Frederic Dieck – Germany Augsburg / Munich

#cop29 #cop16 #un #unitednations #eu #usa #greenpeace #university #students #climatejustice #globalwarming #news #una #universitätaugsburg #fridaysforfuture #nachrichten #icc #internationalcriminalcourt #press #luisaneubauer #talk #tv #gouvernment #oliverfredericdieck #spd #diegrünen #gretathunberg #carlareemtsma #PublicClimateSchool #G20 #ch4 #co2

Meus amigos franceses: estudei economia/gestão DEUG/Ensette em Estrasburgo, França, entre 1990 e 1992. Lá compus, entre outras coisas, os fundamentos do meu primeiro concerto para piano, Estrasburgo, na qualidade de Tchaikovsky. É claro que sei que a França depende 75% da energia nuclear e é a terceira potência nuclear mais forte do mundo como medida de segurança e isto corresponde à utilização pacífica da energia nuclear. Quanto a este último, espero que haja um guarda-chuva nuclear comum, a UE, para proteger também o meu país natal, a Europa. A este respeito, tenho alguma compreensão de que a França vê a energia nuclear como uma força ecológica em transição e negligencia as perspectivas a longo prazo.

Em primeiro lugar: sou Oliver Frederic Dieck O.F.D. Não se trata de clima gay ou de vingança maluca contra Deus. É sobre a vingança da Terra por ter feito de nós, humanos, o verdadeiro câncer da Terra, e sobre como a Terra pode ser curada através de um comportamento melhor. Na minha opinião, basta um derreter na minha frente.( Devemos proteger a floresta tropical e o Delta do Amazonas juntos.Proibir novos produtos feitos de madeira de florestas tropicais e o desmatamento de florestas tropicais e a agricultura de corte e queima…..) Resumindo: O que podemos fazer a nível individual:

Algumas ideias :

• Não compre coisas que sejam realmente lavadas de verde como argumento de marketing. Consulte os custos reais do início ao fim, incluindo os custos sociais e os custos ambientais. Nenhum outro cálculo faz sentido para torná-lo melhor na realidade.
• Precisamos colocar em cada produto uma placa que mostre o real custo ambiental, incluindo a informação, como fazemos hoje em dia com o cigarro e o tabaco, com a informação “Isso pode te matar”.
• Precisamos de impor impostos adicionais que reflictam os custos reais, incluindo os custos para a sociedade ecológica em todo o mundo, e adicioná-los aos preços. Talvez se fizermos isso desta forma pedagógica, precisaremos cortar impostos em outros lugares
• Precisamos de um mundo pacífico, sem loucuras como guerras frias ou quentes, para termos os recursos para corrigir as nossas ações. A dissuasão mútua não é o caminho a seguir. Não há alternativa real à lei e à prisão pacífica. Não precisamos de ditadores e criminosos na liderança mundial. Isso é tudo. Então proceda com cuidado.
• A produção just-in-time e a produção terceirizada devem mudar. Interdependências, alternativas para redução de riscos e motores que utilizam, por exemplo, gás hidrogênio ou outras tecnologias modernas. Então é possível continuar com a produção global. Caso contrário não.
• Não acredite muito nas palavras dos políticos que preferem soluções de boa vontade em vez de quadros jurídicos iguais que obrigam todos os participantes no mercado a serem ecologicamente responsáveis. Caso contrário, não acontecerá nada que nos possa enganar durante mais uma década, até ao nosso fim certo, como tem acontecido durante quatro décadas, incluindo a deslocalização da produção para a então próspera China, Índia e assim por diante.
• Somos muitos neste planeta de 8 bilhões de pessoas. Mas nos países desenvolvidos, com mulheres estudando e acesso gratuito a preservativos sexuais seguros, pelo menos o comportamento da população mudou drasticamente. Nós, europeus, estamos a morrer. Devemos tomar medidas pessoais para as próximas gerações, também para manter estáveis ??o sistema social e económico e os contratos intergeracionais. Mas funcionará da mesma forma noutros lugares se houver também uma modernização da religião e do iluminismo. Penso que o desenvolvimento da Terra é a principal chave para travar o crescimento explosivo da Terra.
• Na Alemanha, o meu estado natal na Europa, um em cada sete trabalhadores depende da indústria automóvel. Na França é diferente, mas semelhante. Portanto, é necessário desenvolver novas tecnologias responsáveis ??pela nossa prosperidade pessoal e pela solução dos nossos problemas climáticos globais.
• Coma menos carne, mais ovos, peixes e aves e, claro, frutas e vegetais. Favoreça fontes em sua área.
• Não compre roupas fast fashion baseadas nas últimas tendências. Na maioria das vezes, a moda apenas vende produtos criando artificialmente uma nova tendência a cada ano. Compre algo de bom no seu estilo individual com qualidade duradoura e fique satisfeito com isso.
• Não jogue tudo fora e recicle se necessário. Reparar é a opção. Novo não é argumento de qualidade!
• Demonstre, use sua rede social e vote neles.
• Resumindo: Pare de lutar pela sua liberdade individual. Lute contra Razões que nos obrigam a usar cada vez menos as nossas liberdades e, em última análise, limitá-las a zero por responsabilidade.

Atenciosamente, Oliver Frederic Dieck. O.F.D para abreviar Oli.

#aquecimento #aquecimentoglobal #antonio guterres #un #ungeneralsecretary #unitednations #globalwarming #eu #portugal #bresil #amazonas #amazonasdelta #protegeraflorestatropical #protegerflorestatropical #florestatropical #florestatropical #luisaneubauer #gretathünberg #fridaysforfuture #trees #plantingtrees #protectingtrees #forbittrainbowforestfurniture #Proibirprodutosdemadeiradeflorestas tropicais #agriculturade corteequeima

Mis amigos franceses: Estudié economía/gestión DEUG/Ensette en Estrasburgo, Francia, entre 1990 y 1992. Allí compuse, entre otras cosas, los fundamentos de mi primer concierto para piano, Estrasburgo, con la calidad de Tchaikovsky. Por supuesto, sé que Francia depende en un 75 % de la energía nuclear y es la tercera potencia nuclear del mundo como medida de seguridad y esto corresponde al uso pacífico de la energía nuclear. En cuanto a esto último, espero que un paraguas nuclear común, la UE, también proteja a mi país de origen, Europa. En este sentido, tengo cierto entendimiento de que Francia ve la energía nuclear como una fuerza ecológica en transición y descuida las perspectivas a largo plazo.

En primer lugar: soy Oliver Frederic Dieck O.F.D. No se trata de un clima gay o de una loca venganza contra Dios. Se trata de la venganza de la Tierra por convertirnos a los humanos en el verdadero cáncer de la Tierra, y de cómo la Tierra puede curarse mediante un mejor comportamiento. En mi opinión, es suficiente que uno se derrita frente a mí. En resumen: ¿Qué podemos hacer a nivel individual?
Algunas ideas :

• No compre cosas que en realidad estén maquilladas de verde como argumento de marketing. Consulte los costos reales de principio a fin, costos sociales y costos ambientales incluidos. Ningún otro cálculo tiene sentido para mejorarlo en la realidad.
• Necesitamos añadir una placa a cada producto que muestre el coste medioambiental real, incluyendo la información, como hacemos hoy con los cigarrillos y el tabaco, con la información „Podría matarte“.
• Necesitamos imponer impuestos adicionales que reflejen los costos reales, incluidos los costos para la sociedad ecológica en todo el mundo, y agregar esto a los precios. Quizás si lo hacemos de esta manera pedagógica necesitemos recortar impuestos en otros lugares.
• Necesitamos un mundo pacífico sin locuras como las guerras frías o calientes para tener los recursos para corregir nuestras acciones. La disuasión mutua no es el camino a seguir. No existe una alternativa real a la ley y al encarcelamiento pacífico. No necesitamos dictadores y criminales en el liderazgo mundial. Eso es todo. Luego proceda con cuidado.
• La producción justo a tiempo y la producción subcontratada deben cambiar. Interdependencias, alternativas para la reducción de riesgos y motores que utilizan, por ejemplo, gas hidrógeno u otras tecnologías modernas. Entonces es posible continuar con la producción global. De otra forma no.
• No creamos demasiado en las palabras de los políticos que prefieren soluciones de buena voluntad en lugar de marcos legales igualitarios que obliguen a todos los participantes del mercado a ser ecológicamente responsables. De lo contrario, no sucederá nada que pueda engañarnos durante otra década hasta nuestro final seguro, como ha ocurrido durante cuatro décadas, incluida la reubicación de la producción en las entonces prósperas China, India, etc.
• Somos demasiados en este planeta de 8 mil millones de personas. Pero en los países desarrollados con mujeres estudiando y acceso gratuito a condones para sexo seguro, al menos el comportamiento de la población ha cambiado drásticamente. Los europeos estamos desapareciendo. Debemos tomar medidas personales para las próximas generaciones, también para mantener estables el sistema social y económico y los contratos intergeneracionales. Pero funcionará de la misma manera en otros lugares si también hay una modernización de la religión y la Ilustración. Creo que el desarrollo de la Tierra es la clave principal para detener el crecimiento explosivo de la Tierra.
• En Alemania, mi estado natal en Europa, uno de cada siete trabajadores depende de la industria del automóvil. En Francia es diferente pero similar. Por tanto, es necesario avanzar en nuevas tecnologías responsables para nuestra prosperidad personal y la solución a nuestros problemas climáticos globales.
• Comer menos carne, más huevos, pescado y aves y por supuesto frutas y verduras. Favorezca las fuentes de su zona.
• No compres ropa de moda rápida basada en las últimas tendencias. La mayoría de las veces, la moda simplemente vende productos creando artificialmente una nueva tendencia cada año. Compre algo bueno en su estilo individual con calidad duradera y siéntase satisfecho con ello.
• No tirar todo a la basura y reciclarlo si es necesario. La reparación es la opción. ¡Lo nuevo no es un argumento a favor de la calidad!
• Manifestarte, utilizar tu red social y votar.
• En resumen: deja de luchar por tu libertad individual. luchar contra las razones que nos obligan a utilizar cada vez menos nuestras libertades y, en última instancia, limitarlas a cero por responsabilidad.

Saludos cordial

#calentamiento #calentamientoglobal #fridaysforfuture #oliverfredericdieck #news #eu #ofd #nachrichten #espagna #chile #argentina #mexico #venezuela #columbia #gretatünberg #luisaneubauer #greenpeace #cop

I miei amici francesi: ho studiato economia/management DEUG/Ensette a Strasburgo, in Francia, tra il 1990 e il 1992. Lì composi, tra le altre cose, le basi del mio primo concerto per pianoforte, Strasburgo, nella qualità di Cajkovskij. Naturalmente so che la Francia dipende per il 75% dall’energia nucleare ed è la terza potenza nucleare più forte al mondo come misura di sicurezza e ciò corrisponde all’uso pacifico dell’energia nucleare. Per quanto riguarda quest’ultimo, spero in un ombrello nucleare comune, l’UE, per proteggere anche il mio paese d’origine, l’Europa. A questo proposito, capisco che la Francia consideri l’energia nucleare come una forza ecologica in transizione e trascuri le prospettive a lungo termine.

Prima di tutto: sono Oliver Frederic Dieck O.F.D. Non si tratta del clima gay o di una folle vendetta su Dio. Riguarda la vendetta della terra per aver reso noi umani il vero cancro della terra, e come la terra possa essere guarita attraverso un comportamento migliore. Secondo me basta che uno si sciolga davanti a me. In breve: cosa possiamo fare a livello individuale:
Qualche idea :

• Non comprare cose che in realtà sono greenwashing come argomento di marketing. Fare riferimento ai costi reali dall’inizio alla fine, compresi i costi sociali e ambientali. Nessun altro calcolo ha senso per renderlo migliore nella realtà.
• Dobbiamo aggiungere su ogni prodotto una targa che mostri il reale costo ambientale, inclusa l’informazione, come facciamo con le sigarette e il tabacco oggigiorno, con la scritta “Potrebbe ucciderti”.
• Dobbiamo imporre tasse aggiuntive che riflettano i costi reali, compresi i costi per la società ecologica in tutto il mondo, e aggiungerli ai prezzi. Forse se lo facciamo in questo modo pedagogico dovremmo tagliare le tasse altrove
• Abbiamo bisogno di un mondo pacifico senza follia come le guerre fredde o calde per avere le risorse per correggere le nostre azioni. La deterrenza reciproca non è la via da seguire. Non esiste una vera alternativa alla legge e alla detenzione pacifica. Non abbiamo bisogno di dittatori e criminali alla guida di tutto il mondo. È tutto. Quindi procedi con attenzione.
• La produzione just-in-time e la produzione esternalizzata devono cambiare. Interdipendenze, alternative per la riduzione del rischio e motori che utilizzano, ad esempio, gas idrogeno o altre tecnologie moderne. Allora sarà possibile continuare con la produzione globale. Altrimenti no.
• Non credere troppo alle parole dei politici che preferiscono soluzioni di buona volontà piuttosto che quadri giuridici paritari che costringono tutti i partecipanti al mercato ad essere ecologicamente responsabili. Altrimenti non accadrà nulla che possa ingannarci per un altro decennio fino alla nostra fine certa, come è avvenuto per quattro decenni compreso il trasferimento della produzione nell’allora prospera Cina, India e così via.
• Siamo troppi su questo pianeta di 8 miliardi di persone. Ma nei paesi sviluppati dove le donne studiano e hanno libero accesso ai preservativi sessuali sicuri, almeno il comportamento della popolazione è cambiato drasticamente. Noi europei stiamo morendo. Dobbiamo adottare misure personali per le prossime generazioni, anche per mantenere stabile il sistema sociale ed economico e i contratti intergenerazionali. Ma funzionerà allo stesso modo altrove se ci sarà anche una modernizzazione della religione e dell’illuminismo. Penso che lo sviluppo della Terra sia la chiave principale per arrestare la crescita esplosiva della Terra.
• In Germania, il mio paese d’origine in Europa, un lavoratore su sette dipende dall’industria automobilistica. In Francia è diverso ma simile. Pertanto, è necessario promuovere nuove tecnologie responsabili per la nostra prosperità personale e la soluzione ai nostri problemi climatici globali.
• Mangia meno carne, più uova, pesce e pollame e ovviamente frutta e verdura. Preferisci le fonti nella tua zona.
• Non acquistare abiti fast fashion basati sulle ultime tendenze. Nella maggior parte dei casi, la moda si limita a vendere beni creando artificialmente una nuova tendenza ogni anno. Acquista qualcosa di buono nel tuo stile individuale con una qualità duratura e sii soddisfatto.
• Non buttare via tutto e riciclarlo se necessario. La riparazione è l’opzione. Nuovo non è un argomento a favore della qualità!
• Dimostra, usa il tuo social network e vota.
• In breve: smetti di lottare per la tua libertà individuale. lottare contro le ragioni che ci costringono a utilizzare gradualmente meno le nostre libertà e, infine, a ridurle a zero per responsabilità.

Cordiali saluti, Oliver Frederic Dieck. OFD per breve Oli.

#riscaldamento #riscaldamentoglobale #fridaysforfuture #problemiclimaticiglobali #greenpeace #verde #gretathunberg #gretathünberg #vaticano #un #eu #europa #opera #luisaneubauer #cop #unitednations #oliverfredericdieck #ofd #toskana #italia #roma #turin #milano

Anheizen

0 Anmerkungen